dax calculate multiple filters on same column dax calculate multiple filters on same column

What positional accuracy (ie, arc seconds) is necessary to view Saturn, Uranus, beyond? Defines the columns that are used to partition a WINDOW functions parameter. I am trying to do a CALCULATE with a filter based on a related table. The measure is used to show the total hours posted where Calls. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. However, you should always consider that a physical relationship can provide an improvement of one or two order of magnitudes for a high cardinality relationship. If the granularity is small (up to hundreds of values), this approach is probably good enough. Returns the value for the row that meets all criteria specified by search conditions. Boolean filter expressions. Returns multiple rows which are positioned within the given interval. TREATAS ( , [, [, ] ] ). Next I created this measure and placed that in the Filter on this Visual section of the table. Pleas be aware that the table is defined w/o a table name and w/o a name for the column. I think the way you have it, you are concatenating all the values into 1 string, which doesn't exist. Are you looking for a version that replaces local filters rather than adding to them like this? HI I am trying to Filter a fact table based on column values in the filter table and also in the fact table. For this example, we simply told the CALCULATE function to filter DayNames different from "Saturday" and different from "Sunday". I will edit my post immediately. Marco is a business intelligence consultant and mentor. Thanks in advance for any help or advice you might have! Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. How can I filter multiple columns that include the same value in Power BI? But it seems that my measure (see image below) doesnt give any result. Are you able to assist? (Ep. When there are multiple filters, they're evaluated by using the AND logical operator. Thus, if you have a slicer filtering the brand Proseware, you will see the sales amount of only the products Red belonging to Proseware brand, ignoring any product of the Contoso brand. The YearMonth calculated column simply combines year and month number in a single value. 11. my current favorite to check if one value is contained in a set of values is using the newer IN() operator, The statement above will not work due a type, the correct statement uses curly braces, why is explained in my last post. Horizontal and vertical centering in xltabular, SQL query to change rows into columns based on the aggregation from rows. DAX - Calculating at the Line Level (SUMX) with Multiple Filters, DAX calculated column for related table with different grain, ALLEXCEPT not working when filtering blanks, Power BI: COUNTA across multiple columns with multiple filter criteria, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Reach developers & technologists worldwide, DAX Multiple filters across multiple columns to produce new table, When AI meets IP: Can artists sue AI imitators? The first is based on FILTER, and it works on any version of DAX. I have tried: I need to calculate a measure and for doing so need to apply multiple filters to obtain the desired value. You can optimize this by filtering only the two colors and two countries upfront, so the CROSSJOIN only materializes four combinations, but the entire process is removed by using TREATAS, which creates an arbitrary filter that is pushed to the storage engine in a direct way, without having to materialize a table in advance. FILTER('InternetSales_USD', RELATED('SalesTerritory' [SalesTerritoryCountry])<>"United States") Returns a table that is a subset of Internet Sales minus all rows . && 'Back Charge Data'[Selling Brand] in {"Drafting", "Engineering"}). Hi, You caould use Countrows with filter lets say that your column name is A and your table name is Table1 the dax will be =countrows (filter (table1,table1 [A]="Yes")) and lets say that you have more than value in your column A and you want to count each one then use = COUNTROWS (FILTER (Table1,Table1 [A] =EARLIER (Table1 . Dont know of a more elegant way to achieve this but maybe this will do. I am to author a report that has a few tables in the model with relationships intact. A virtual relationship is a DAX pattern to transfers a filter context from a table to another, simulating the behavior of a physical relationship defined in the data model. I am trying to create a new metric "# Orders" with different filters: * on column "KPI", sum only the KPI called "# Orders". I don't think my columnINCIDENT_CATEGORY has any Boolean. The correct statement will look like, Assuming that the STATUS comes from a slicer, this would also be possible, Maybe this idea helps you give another idea, Thank you for all your contributions to this site. its depend on your model. Does a password policy with a restriction of repeated characters increase security? You already have tons of resources on our site PowerPivotPro.com Click the button to learn about Power Pivot and Power BI. Eigenvalues of position operator in higher dimensions is vector, not scalar? When AI meets IP: Can artists sue AI imitators? By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. I was struggling to find an alternative to using || and "or". To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. I really need help here. Are there any canonical examples of the Prime Directive being broken that aren't shown on screen? This is because the cost of a relationship depends on the cardinality of the filter propagated. How can I create a slicer in Power BI to ensure I can filter uniquely by: If wanted to use the above formular to filter by column 1 (Text values) and an additonal columns (Text values) how would that work? Find out more about the April 2023 update. Read more, This article describes how to implement a DAX measure to run faster than what you get from the built-in fusion optimization. Using CROSSJOIN, you obtain all the possible combination of the values you have in the columns referenced, regardless of the fact that the combination exists in the underlying table. i just have the solution for this case.. Measure 3 = CALCULATE([TotalExaminations];Examinations[exa_StatusID] = "WAI" ||Examinations[exa_StatusID] = "VER" ||Examinations[exa_StatusID] = "APP" ||Examinations[exa_StatusID] = "HEL" ||Examinations[exa_StatusID] = "SCH" ). Treats the columns of the input table as columns from other tables.For each column, filters out any values that are not present in its respective output column. I currently have a table in Power BI named Jira Tickets. Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support. For example, you can write this calculation to retrieve the quantity of Blue products sold in France plus the Green products sold in Ireland. TotalFires = COUNTX(Query1,Query1[INCIDENT_CATEGORY] IN {"Accidental Dwelling Fire". * filter OUT (do not add in the sum) the combination of 2 filters on 2 other columns: the value "1" on column "Is a partner order" and the value "1" on column "Flag partner". However, you cannot write a single filter argument referencing two different columns. FILTER. This little example creates a table with on column and two rows. The idea is that when a user for example filters by Pang, every pivoted column that has this code within the date range should display it in the report. You can define the Total Advertising measure using the TREATAS function to perform this filter propagation. What is more important, you will not override the existing filter on such a column. Returns a single row that is positioned either before or after the. Parabolic, suborbital and ballistic trajectories all follow elliptic paths. Returns the rows of left-side table which appear in right-side table. Grapes? For example (I know this is wrong) I want to write something like: Measure = FILTER('Table 1', [Column1] = "Red" && [Column2] = "Blue") The requirement is that when you choose a field in the slicer, it should filter the pivoted columns to return that code or in another word, find the matching code in the pivoted columns within the date range. If you want to compare the sum of SalesAmount and AdvertisingAmount for each month, you need to propagate the filter context from Date to Advertising. And yes! Hi all, SUMX requires a table or an expression that results in a table. (This is the file Day and Month Granularity Without Relationships.pbix in the samples you can download.) In the following picture, you see that the Total Advertising computes a correct computation month by month, whereas the column AdvertisingAmount simply sums the value of the corresponding column for all the rows in Advertising, because there is no filter propagation between Date (which has a month selected in every row of the report) and Advertising. Specifies cross filtering direction to be used in the evaluation of a DAX expression. This could be expensive for low cardinality columns in a large table. How to Pass Multiple Filters in Calculate using a Measure in PowerBI | AND & OR | MiTutorials0:00 - 1:16 - What are we learning today ?2:05 - 2:46 - Measure . When you define an arbitrary shaped filter, the TREATAS function has flexibility and efficiency that is harder to obtain using INTERSECT. The forum Power Pivot is closed to new topics and replies. 2004-2023 SQLBI. The SalesKey column uniquely identify each row in the Header table, and it has an inactive one-to-many relationship to the Detail table. Conclusions. It could be potentially faster than the table scan for a complex filter condition, but in terms of performance you have to consider whether alternative KEEPFILTERS syntax could be better, depending on data distribution. I have tables and relatins like like. I have come across a similar problem and your above solution works perfect for me. If you want to replicate these tests on your own machine, open the HeaderDetails.pbix file, then start DAX Studio and connect it to Power BI Destkop. All rights reserved. I have added the data model to the question. The approach using INTERSECT has a simpler DAX syntax. You can also use TREATAS with two or more columns. * filter OUT (do not add in the sum) the combination of 2 filters on 2 other columns: the value "1" on column "Is a partner order" and the value "1" on column "Flag partner". Most of the times, you can move a filter from a SUMMARIZECOLUMNS argument Read more, SUMMARIZE is a very powerful and very complex function to use. Get BI news and original content in your inbox every 2 weeks! NOTE: This article is about table filter arguments, and does not consider directive arguments (such as ALL, USERELATIONSHIP, CROSSFILTER, ) that alter the filter context without applying a list of values as a new filter. Hi,Calculate has a built in [filter] places in its expression and thus you don't need to add FILTER to your calculation. What is this brick with a round back and a stud on the side used for? rev2023.5.1.43405. In this category. Content Discovery initiative April 13 update: Related questions using a Review our technical responses for the 2023 Developer Survey, xcolor: How to get the complementary color. Here I mean that having one of them true is fine, the values I want to exclude are the ones where BOTH filters combined are true (1 AND 1). DAX Multiple filters across multiple columns to produce new table. This thread already has a best answer. All rights are reserved. If you cannot use a physical relationship, you should implement a virtual relationship using. The most simple form to define a table with just one column is to use {"curly", "braces"}. The function can apply one or more search conditions. CALCULATE ( SUM (Fact Table [amount]) , Dim Table [Color] = "Green") Not sure if there is an easy or "right" way to do this but it would make . [Sch Engineer]=Hours.Employee AND Calls.ProjID=Hours.ProjID. See below for sample of data: What I am trying to get when filtering open status with the measure, What I am trying to get when filtering closed status with the measure, Issues include:>There are duplicate project IDs listed in the project ID column based on different revision numbers>There are different status associated to the latest revision number - MAX function does not seem to workAttempt 1 to filter current budget total for closed status:Current Budget:=CALCULATE(SUM([Budget]),FILTER(Variation_amount,[Status]="Closed"), FILTER(Variation_amount, [Revision]=MAX([Revision])))Attempt 2 to filter current budget total for closed status:Current budget:=CALCULATE(SUM([Budget]),FILTER(ALLEXCEPT(Variation_amount, [Project], [Status]), [Status]="Closed" && [Revision]=MAX([Revision])))Any help is appreciated!Thanks,Raymond, Contact FAQ Privacy Policy Code of Conduct, Community Summit Europe - 2021 Mailing List, Community Summit Australia - 2021 Mailing List. A Boolean expression filter is an expression that evaluates to TRUE or FALSE. The ability to create CALCULATE filter arguments with multiple columns simplifies the DAX code and usually provides better performance. In the following table, you can see a comparison of the execution time between the different techniques. Thanks for sharing the solution and it resolved my needs. Did the drapes in old theatres actually say "ASBESTOS" on them? I have tried. The result of this filter is identical to the ALL columns filter, you might just observe different performance in the two approaches. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. SUM('Back Charge Data' [Back Charge Cost]), all ('Back Charge Data'), 'Back Charge Data' [OPL] in {"CECO", "METALLIC", "STAR"}, At this point, the Total Advertising measure can be defined using a simple SUM aggregation. Otherwise returns alternateResult. The file HeaderDetail.pbix in the samples you can download has a simple schema with two tables, Header and Detail. #2. This behavior is identical for all the filter arguments of CALCULATE and CALCULATETABLE. Folder's list view has different sized fonts in different folders, one or more moons orbitting around a double planet system. To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. 566), Improving the copy in the close modal and post notices - 2023 edition, New blog post from our CEO Prashanth: Community is the future of AI. Returns the current value of the specified column in an outer evaluation pass of the specified column. The lookup functions work by using tables and relationships, like a database. This article describes how to use GROUPBY in nested grouping scenarios and other improvements. Returns a table that is a crossjoin of the specified tables. In this article. This is the syntax using KEEPFILTERS: The SUMMARIZE function generates a list of the existing combinations between two or more columns, and can be used with columns belonging to different tables if they are connected in a many-to-one relationships chain. Read more, This article describes how to use the Group By Columns property to store the slicer selection by using the same column used in a SWITCH function to optimize the query performance. The value on each row of the table is correct. CROSSFILTER ( , , ). Something like this should work: Back Charge Int.Cost =. Pleas be aware that the table is defined w/o a table name and w/o a name for the column. UPDATE 2017-01-30 : Excel 2016, Power BI, and SSAS Tabular 2016 now have SUMMARIZECOLUMNS, which should replace the use of SUMMARIZE described in this article for DAX queries, but it cannot replace it in measures. In the end my formula worked, it was just a question of summing the right column [Sum of Value2] instead of [Sum of Value]. Optimizing DAX expressions involving multiple measures. Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total). Creates a summary of the input table grouped by the specified columns. A filter predicate with a simple AND condition between two columns works faster if replaced by two filter arguments, one for each column.. Just to recap, we have two patterns in DAX to manage virtual relationships. If the relationship is a many-to-many, you can implement the pattern described in the article Many-to-many relationships in Power BI and Excel 2016. This problem is described in more details in the article Costs of Relationships in DAX. Find out more about the April 2023 update. as far as I can tell the syntax is perfectly fine for what you're trying to achieve, with just 2 typos - you use. Returns all the rows in a table, or all the values in a column, ignoring any filters that might have been applied. Hi , just add aNOT in the starting of the Filter. Process Code Model.pbix (73.3 KB) However, you can use CROSSJOIN to combine columns of different tables, which is not possible using the ALL syntax. Read more, This article introduces the Data Ecosystem, an innovative evolution of the modern data warehouse architecture. You can find more details about the internal behavior and the related performance in The Definitive Guide to DAX. Process Code Model.pbix (70.5 KB). . FILTER () steps through the TableToFilter one row at a time. Returns the unique ranking of a row within the given interval. The simpler syntax using INTERSECT is not very efficient if compared to the TREATEAS one: Using the CROSSJOIN you materialize a table that is not required. However, it requires the relationship to be defined in the data model. Lets see in the following examples why you should follow these rules. Because FILTER () goes one row at a time, it can be quite slow if you use it against a large table. This little example creates a table with on column and two rows. This same column is used in the slicer to filter the report. For example, If I wanted to filter by Apples, I would need to select multiple Apples values from Label Label 1 Label 2 and Label 4. This technique is useful whenever a relationship does not exist, or when it cannot be created because the relationship is not a one-to-many, or because it is defined by two or more columns. Read more, This article describes how to implement a DAX measure to run faster than what you get from the built-in fusion optimization. Returns a table that represents a subset of another table or expression. Hey, thanks for this, what if you want to do the opposite, you need to select values you DONT want in your results, how would that look like? You have seen that the best practice is to always use a physical relationship whenever possible. Fact Table [Items] <many-- 1> Dim Table [Items] However I wan to do a DAX CALCULATE like this. The following Sales table measure definition produces a ratio of sales over sales for all sales channels. This approach provides the best performances, because it removes the need of materializing a large number of rows that must be computed by the formula engine. This article describes the possible rounding differences that can appear in DAX. (In reality, in the sample data the Detail table has only one for each Header row, but this is not relevant for the performance comparison of this test.). This could be expensive for low cardinality columns in a large table. I don't know your data model. I am using Power BI and I have a table with multiple Columns and Rows that I want to filter with DAX. This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by tomallan 6 years, 9 months ago. With some work, I realized that the problem was in the data, not in the used DAX, but thanks for the improvement, How would I add on to this a condition that excludes a value? Physical and Virtual Relationships in DAX, Many-to-many relationships in Power BI and Excel 2016, Rounding errors with different data types in DAX, Optimizing SWITCH on slicer selection with Group By Columns, Navigating the Data Ecosystem: A Revolutionary Analytics Architecture, Optimizing fusion optimization for DAX measures, Displaying only child values in parent-child Unplugged #46. In the queries used to evaluate the performance, we will make the relationship active only to measure the performance of the physical relationship, whereas it will be ignored by testing the different approaches using virtual relationship. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. You can write a filter over two columns by creating a special table having only the columns you need. Read more, This article introduces the Data Ecosystem, an innovative evolution of the modern data warehouse architecture. This might help: https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Desktop/Import-Excel-Pivot-to-PowerBI-Possible/td-p/136729 DAX - Sum of values based on conditions from other columnxlsx, https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Desktop/Import-Excel-Pivot-to-PowerBI-Possible/td-p/136729. How do I accomplish this task, please? I'm trying to get a filtered set / count ofINCIDENT_CATEGORY whereINCIDENT_CATEGORY contains the values in my expression, How to Get Your Question Answered Quickly. Keep me informed about BI news and upcoming articles with a bi-weekly newsletter (uncheck if you prefer to proceed without signing up for the newsletter), Send me SQLBI promotions (only 1 or 2 emails per year). Copyright 2020 Dynamic Communities. Format to British Pound and let's put it on the canvas. Separate the status column into two columns: To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. Pears If you can filter "other" table by one column by label then use relationship; Relationship between which two columns on which tables? What makes this test meaningful is the cardinality of the SalesKey column, which has 3,406,089 rows. For example, if you have a slicer filtering the brand Proseware, you will see the sales amount of the products Red regardless of the brand, summed to the sales of the entire Contoso brand, regardless of the color but products of Red color and Contoso brand will be summed only once, without duplicating their value.